The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare
students: A systematic review.
Rowe, M., Frantz, J., Bozalek, V. (2012). Medical Teacher, 34: 216-221.
According to Garrison & Kanuka
2004, cited in Rowe, Frantz & Bozalek (2012), blended learning refers to
the systematic integration of online and face-to-face engagement to support and
enhance meaningful interaction between students, teachers and resources. The
aim of this research paper was to review studies on the impact of blended
learning in the clinical education of health care students. Articles related to
the aim was searched and retrieved online. From an initial seventy one articles
related to evaluation of blended learning in the clinical setting, seven
articles were finally selected and reviewed. Blended learning interventions described in
each study was evaluated.
It was found that none of the
interventions used in any of the studies were alike. Interventions included the
use of a range of technologies used in different ways to enhance and expand the
clinical experiences of healthcare students. In some cases, the individual
technologies were mentioned specifically, and these included Voice over
Internet Protocol, interactive whiteboards, course management systems, online
lectures, video on CD, online multiple choice questions (MCQs) and blogs. The
face-to-face components of the blended approaches included lectures, small
group discussion, and completion of workbooks, practical sessions and game show
formats for evaluation.
Results of the evaluation showed
that some measure of improvement in students’ competencies, including
reflective thinking skills, clinical skills, e.g. history taking, examination,
reporting, documentation and patient management, self-efficacy and clinical
reasoning was noted with blended learning approaches. Two studies suggested
that using a blended approach helped students to bridge the gap between theory
and practice in clinical scenarios.
It was also noted that although
blended learning makes use of computers and the internet, it should be
remembered that the focus should not be on the technology; rather, the educator
must first determine the best way to teach a particular topic and then
determine how technology might enhance the teaching (Laurillard 1993, cited in Rowe,
Frantz & Bozalek, 2012). Also, while an innovative approach to clinical
teaching may be effective, it also requires a cultural change in teaching
practice, which has implications for its effective implementation (Gray &
Tobin 2010 cited in Rowe, Frantz & Bozalek, 2012).
This article applies to health science
education in general. I agree that blended learning interventions should not be
a “nice to have” approach to teaching and learning. It must be fit for purpose
and add value. If designed and effectively implemented, there is sure potential
to offer benefit. It is certainly requires a mindset change from the traditional
approach to teaching and learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment